Q. I started my reporting career a little more than a year ago at a small twice-weekly newspaper with a circulation of about 3,500. I've been fortunate in the fact that I get a lot of freedom in what I write, and
ASK JOE A QUESTION
|
To get your question answered on this page, send it to Joe. Please include your full name in your message. If you prefer that your surname not be published, please indicate that. Sign up to receive Ask the Recruiter by e-mail. (sent Monday-Friday at 8 a.m.) |
|
I've had the chance to cover a wide variety of topics. I have amassed a lot of solid clips and a few great clips. I realize that if my ultimate goal is to get to a major daily (which it is), spending more time where I am is not going to help me out. I need to get to a small daily to get to a big daily.
So, how small is too small? I have started sending out my resume and clips and have had a couple of interviews so far. One paper in particular seems very interested, a six-day paper with circulation of about 6,000. I'm wondering, though, would I be better off to wait and keep pushing for something in the 20,000-circulation range? Or should I get my daily chops where I can?
Moving on Up
A. I'd try for 20,000 but give 6,000 a serious look. It could be a tough stretch, crossing over from weeklies to dailies and growing your circulation by 500 percent.
As your goal is to get to a major daily, you're going to have to overcome a couple of huge bumps to get there. Doubling your circulation size every two years would take 12 years and half a dozen papers just to get to 100,000. And I doubt you want to do all that jumping.
Of course, you never know until you apply, but I'd be wary of passing up a good offer on the untested hope of getting a much better one. Still, because you started pretty small, you are going to have to make some big advances somewhere along the line.
Coming Tuesday: She is eager to return to journalism and wonders whether the multimedia
work she'd like to undertake at her non-profit will be appreciated by
newsroom managers.